graphic options:
benchmarks:
PC shots from KyleN (who better get in here and comment on performance):
lets just dump whatever info on PC performance we have here. I need-to-know
can we do this already? some people on GAF seem to have it and I feel like we need some confirmation on how this performs.
graphic options:
graphic options:
Last edited by SalsaShark; 11-28-2012 at 01:39 AM.
how can people have this already ? I thought 29th was the earliest
i think asia might be 28th
I hate you Kylen. I HATEEEE YOUUUUU :P
Wonder how my gtx460 would fare at 720p. Id love to get as much of the hotness as possible.
If I ever post something in Japanese which I don't understand, please BAN me.
(11-28-2012, 01:41 AM)
Wow, those benchmarks are rough. 36 fps avg with a 680 with no AA? Crazy.
My 460 am cry. :(
What's up with the benches in the OP? Looks like the game runs like ass in virtually every card.
Subscribed. Gotta know if my 460 can handle this with at least some decent settings and frame rates lol
If I ever post something in Japanese which I don't understand, please BAN me.
(11-28-2012, 01:44 AM)
So I will be getting the GTX 660 ti, how likely is it that there will be Nvidia performance boosting patches for this down the road?
What the hell, why is it around 30fps on a 680?
My monitor is 2560x1440 and I have a 680, I guess this means I'll get sub 30fps?
My monitor is 2560x1440 and I have a 680, I guess this means I'll get sub 30fps?
Is this a new trend? New great looking games with fucking terrible performance?
Uh, going by the benchmark, how will I even manage to run this on a Core 2 Duo and a HD5870? ):
very likely, probably beta driversSo I will be getting the GTX 660 ti, how likely is it that there will be Nvidia performance boosting patches for this down the road?
how much of a "boost" though? no idea, possibly not much
games that look great tend to be beefy specs-wise?Originally Posted by The English Conquistador
Is this a new trend? New great looking games with fucking terrible performance?
not saying this doesnt seem excessive, hence why im asking for some first-hand experience
It could very well be some single setting that kills performance like ubersampling in The Witcher 2 or the DX11 features in Arkham City. I'm curious how it scales.
Isn't new at all. The best PC games---in terms of graphics---generally tax the best hardware available at the time. Which of course is a good thing.Originally Posted by The English Conquistador
Is this a new trend? New great looking games with fucking terrible performance?
What they also typically do is allow you to turn down/off most of that eyecandy and still run the game on midrange hardware.
What you'll notice about the posted results are that they are with everything maxed out. The real question in my mind is how it runs at reasonable settings, at 1080p.
I also have a 680 and I am taking this german benchmark with a grain of salt since the day it was posted. It could just be a single setting that is totally messing with the FPS like the previous poster said, so have some hope.
Looking forward to putting this on my 5770
I agree I assume its going to be the incredible draw distance in conjunction with AO. Id love to see the numbers when AO is off to compare.Originally Posted by Felix Lighter
It could very well be some single setting that kills performance like ubersampling in The Witcher 2 or the DX11 features in Arkham City. I'm curious how it scales.
It has certainly happened before. I am not ready for this to slay my 670ftw, so it better be false.I also have a 680 and I am taking this german benchmark with a grain of salt since the day it was posted. It could just be a single setting that is totally messing with the FPS like the previous poster said, so have some hope.
Yeah cutting out AO would be one of my first steps, though the benches say there's no AA on at all (lol)Originally Posted by bloodyroarxx
Yea but I assume you crank down the Ambient Occlusion and your framerate improves dramatically and at 1080p resolution you could lose some of the Anti Aliasing too
My 570 is going to go tits up. I may need a funeral for her. Her name is Petunia.
If I ever post something in Japanese which I don't understand, please BAN me.
(11-28-2012, 01:51 AM)
There are reports Directx 11 is not selectable in the options menu.
IGN said there will be a day 1 patch for PC.
IGN said there will be a day 1 patch for PC.
TotalBiscuit does a 40+ minute video the PC version. Looks good in 1080p.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvMQAkoue6w&feature=g-u
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvMQAkoue6w&feature=g-u
does he mention his specs or performance at any point?Originally Posted by bearythebear
TotalBiscuit does a 40+ minute video the PC version. Looks good in 1080p.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvMQAkoue6w&feature=g-u
I wonder how this will run on my SLI 560 TI's???
so wait for beta drivers + cap at 30 fps?
So...
i5 3570k
Gigabyte 670
8 GB of mem
I'm not over-clocking anything yet (really because I havn't gotten the balls to figure out how yet)
i5 3570k
Gigabyte 670
8 GB of mem
I'm not over-clocking anything yet (really because I havn't gotten the balls to figure out how yet)
Well I sure hope it's not as broken as AssCreed 3 in terms of performance.
That performance is complete ass considering what it looks like. Crysis looks better to my eyes.
Probably the use of an intermediary AO setting should be enough to play this @ 1080p / Post Process AA methods with a GTX 580+ with acceptable framerates.
Why is dx11 multithreading off in those options?
My specs:
i7 2600k stock cloks
GTX 670
16gb ram.
Max settings, 1920x1080
average FPS 70
I have never seen it go below 55 fps yet.
This is with DX9 tho, so no MSAA etc.
If i downsample from 2560x1440 i get about 45-50 fps avg.
And two more screens:)
i7 2600k stock cloks
GTX 670
16gb ram.
Max settings, 1920x1080
average FPS 70
I have never seen it go below 55 fps yet.
This is with DX9 tho, so no MSAA etc.
If i downsample from 2560x1440 i get about 45-50 fps avg.
And two more screens:)
